I mean of course those pieces of clothing relegated to the darkest corners of the wardrobe - the sartorial misfits guilty of crimes and misdemeanors regarding fit or finish or, alternatively, pieces that have been auctioned, thrifted or abandoned for some reason.
A few resolute individuals have preferred to mete out draconian punishment to such miscreants and outcasts, grimly putting them under the executioner's blade (or scissors in this case). I refer exhibit A to the jury: Manton's medieval drawing and quartering of a suit jacket made by NYC tailor Nicolosi. I've met Manton and he's a nice fellow but these post-quartering pictures of a bespoke jacket are a bit gruesome if you are the sensitive type.
Others, under the aegis of scientific research, have offered up their sartorial orphans, outcasts and donated specimens to established tailors for step-by-step clinical dissection. I refer exhibit B to the jury: Jeffery D's dissection of a jacket by Savile Row tailor Maurice Sedwell. If you believe in the betterment of mankind through basic research, this is an option worth putting on the operating table, so to speak.
On the other hand, I think there is also a third option, namely, progressive rehabilitation of a garment under the hands of an able tailor. The goal is gradual re-introduction into society and one's wardrobe.
I offer up exhibit C: a Brioni single-breasted, two-piece suit in a lovely chalkstripe flannel. It features a straight Roman shoulder but soft canvas in the chest and light padding on top. Unfortunately as seen below, I purchased this RTW suit at the beginning of my sartorial journey and committed the rookie mistake of buying the suit sight unseen. I ended up with a suit whose proportions are excessively elongated for my build.
The photos are a bit blurry but they convey the seriousness of the sartorial infractions - excessive jacket length, seriously oversized chest, shoulder and back dimensions and of course the trouser length which is the only thing that is easily fixable.
Brace yourself. Much like Manton's pictures, the photos of an oversized Brioni hanging off my frame are not for the squeamish.
![]() |
| Original Brioni - front view |
![]() |
| Original Brioni - back view |
But I knew one tailor who might be open to the challenge - Los Angeles tailor Enzo Caruso. So I dropped by one day this summer and casually brought it up. Interestingly, he was up to the task, mainly I think due to the lovely flannel fabric which was languishing away in storage.
Below are the initial fitting photos after the re-cut of the jacket (with the trousers still untouched):
![]() |
| Fitting stage for re-cut Brioni |
![]() |
| Fitting stage for re-cut Brioni |
![]() |
| Finished Brioni (sleeves lengthened from fitting stage) |
![]() |
| Finished Brioni (shortened and trimmed back and shoulders) |
For your viewing pleasure, I include intermediate, fitting photos of a different MTM sports jacket from a well-known brand which also needed to be re-cut:
![]() |
| Fitting stage for re-cut MTM jacket |
![]() |
| Fitting stage for re-cut MTM jacket |
Finally, from a material standpoint any ill-fitting suits will need to have excess cloth (i.e. be oversized) in order for this to work. So save this option for the most worthy cases. I'm happy I did.








I have had the shorten-from-top procedure performed on suit jackets, sportcoats, topcoats, casual jackets, and even shirts perhaps 200 times over the course of a decade and a half. The reasons have been various -- the jacket was too long but could not be shortened at the bottom, the armholes were too low, and/or the button stance was too low. The operation has better chance of success if the waist and chest are a little roomy, or at least there is enough seam allowance to let out. That's because once you hike up a jacket an inch or so, it will fit more snugly than before.
ReplyDelete20, not 200 !
ReplyDelete200 times would be quite a lot of times! But I'm glad to hear you've had success with this operation a number of times. It's certainly doable in the hands of a capable tailor.
ReplyDeletejust take the back in that does it in most peoples eyes
ReplyDelete